Share Button

The 35mm lens is one of those key lenses you should have in your kit, like a 50mm and an 85mm. Especially if you are using a crop sensor camera. On those camera cameras it gives you your standard lens field of view.

There are loads of 35mm lenses out there. The best one, certainly for video has just been released. The Zeiss 35mm F1.4 is beautiful. Lovely optics. Fast. Incredibly well made. Unfortunately out of the price bracket of many people as it’s around $1900. Worth the money? Yes if you are a pro for sure.

For others, a really nice new option has come out for about a quarter of the price.

The Samyang 35mm F1.4 is a manual focus lens. No auto in this (neither has the Zeiss), but that is fine for video. In fact it’s great as we have hard stops on the focus. Also key for me is the iris is actually on the lens rather than controlled via the camera. The video guy in me much prefers this and of course with an adaptor you can use this lens on other cameras like the AF101 or F3 with a Canon EOS adaptor and still have iris control.

It actually has been made in various mounts…Canon, Pentax, Nikon, 4/3, Sony etc…

Quality wise…it’s not a Zeiss, but it’s pretty nice and for the money great value.

I haven’t shot any video with it yet. But here a couple of photos of my cats on the Canon 5Dmk2. It covers both the full frame and the APS-C




I bought mine here for 415 Euros which is about $600 from Poland and it came to my pretty quickly. This lens is often rebranded so keep an eye out for it under the name Rokinon and other such names. Do a google for it and you will find it.

It’s not perfect, I hear there are some chromatic aberrations in far detail but from the reviews I have read it’s all pretty positive.I wouldn’t expect perfection in a 35mm F1.4 prime lens that covers a full frame and APS-C for this price. But it’s pretty bloody good!

This is my second Samyang one. I already have the 8mm fish eye and it’s sweet. Good job on this new 35mm F1.4!

Share Button
Liked it? Take a second to support Philip Bloom on Patreon!


  1. Really nice Philip!

    I’ve started an online petition to Samyang for developing Cine-Style versions of all their primes (adding some others too). They did it with their 8mm fisheye:

    It’s here:

    please, spread the word!!

  2. Ruben Kremer says:

    I read about this lens recently, and the only this I kept wondering about was the quality of this lens compared to the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 – which is in approx. the same pricerange. If having to choose one of the two – which one would it be …

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      this covers the full frame, the sigma does not and has a manual aperture…

      1. Ruben Kremer says:

        Good point! I won’t be shooting with a FF camera for a while I suspect, but it’s a good thing to keep in mind! Manual aperture is a pro, certainly, but can be overcome if the glass-quality is better on the Sigma

      2. andi says:

        it’s hard to play with micro4/3, the framming is only 33 degrees..,
        maybe 28mm will be nice for apsc to..

  3. Bob Rant says:

    I don’t really understand… How can this lens cover APS-C and Full Frame ? Is it a 35 mm on FF or APS-C ?

    1. aombk says:

      if a lens covers FF sensors it covers APS-C as well because they are smaller. lenses usually report their field of view on FF sensors not in angles but in mm that is an equivalent of another equivalent which i find paranoid by the way.

      anyway this lens is 35mm on FF and 1.6x35mm on APS-C sensors.

    2. Bryan Harley says:

      All lenses made for FF cameras will work with ASP-C cameras. But due to the crop factor this 35mm will be more of a 50mm on ASP-C.

      1. Yusuf says:

        I am yusung all samyang lenses they are great
        35 1.4
        85 1.4

      2. Yusuf says:

        I am using all samyang lenses they are great !!
        35 1.4
        85 1.4

        1. Yusuf says:

          Hi phill what is better for video canon 5D mark ii or panasonic HG2 which is sharper ?

  4. Bob Rant says:

    I will. Thanks !

  5. tomhaegler says:

    I’d love to compare this lens to my Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4! The Flek’s only 2.4 but can close-focus to about 9cm!

  6. Kevin Dooley says:

    Nice to see a decent prime for video that’s priced well and not 50 years old and being sold on eBay. Now to find a comparable 24mm, 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm…

    1. Samyang have a 85mm 1.4 for sale which is excellent. We still need a 24 and a 85…

  7. It looks quite interesting to me, BUT I’m not sure I would buy it since I find the Zeiss (ZF2/ZE) is not so much expansive for what it is (if it is really the same optics we can find on a CP.2 !)

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      It’s very good. Yes it is slower. If you want that extra bit of light…

  8. Haejong says:

    Great! I’m a big fan of Samyang/Rokinon lenses. I can’t wait to see a video taken with this Samyang or Rokinon 35mm f1.4 lens. Amazon already has this lens up for pre-sale. Look for Rokinon 35mm f1.4. They say it will be available within 2 weeks. Yeah~* 😀

  9. alex karas says:

    Thanks for the info. Have you used the Samyang 14mm. I’m curious about that one.

    1. Haejong says:

      They have a Facebook page. Maybe you can ask them directly.

    2. I ve been using the 14 f2.8 since january, its an amazing lens well worth the money!you can see it here on the opening time-lapse

      (we had a 16-35 2.8 L but I opted for the 14mm it made a difference.. (the museum would not fit the frame of the 16)

      I cant wait for the 35 1.4 to be available…

  10. Valon says:

    What focal length will this lens become if I use it with Panasonic 101?
    I would assume 75mm since it covers both FF and DX?
    I am after a 35mm and 75mm for my Panasonic, any suggestions?
    Very Best regards

  11. tschikay says:

    You where passionate about the 35 mm 1.4 L from Canon, and now in a post about a 35 mm Lens you do not mention that jewel in one word, how come? Is the Zeiss so much better?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      The Zeiss 35mm F1.4 is the top of the tree for video DSLR work. The Canon 35mm F1.4 is a great lens, but a bit tired and needs replacing as it’s not the sharpest compared to say the 50mm F1.2 or 24mm F1.4. For stills the L series is still probably number one choice

      1. tschikay says:

        thanks for your reply, the most popular picture from flickr (obama and hillary in the situation room) was made with 5d mark II and 35 1.4 L…yes, it’s a great lens and for me still Nr. 1 😉

  12. Daan says:

    This is coincidental… I was in NYC last week to see if they had the Voigtländer 35mm 1.4 but they didn’t and I didn’t like the plasticy feel of the 30mm 1.4 Sigma (focus was awful on manual) and I was looking for a 35mm Zuiko in f2 but couldn’t find it and came across this one wondering if there were any reviews yet and here you are. Good to read it’s worth the money, how heavy and large is it? Looks pretty substantial but great it has a Canon mount.
    Ordering it now.

  13. Mickey Jones says:

    I am hesitant to purchase an off-brand lens due to the fact that I am always considering resale value when I make a purchase and well-know brands tend to do well in the used market.

    However, the ability to cover FF and APS-C is a huge selling point since I own a 7D but I foresee a time when crop sensors will fall by the wayside as FF becomes less expensive. That has kept me from purchasing the Sigma.

    In addition, the huge aperture at such a low price is very appealing for low-light video work. I am always struggling to keep the ISO as low as possible. Of course an endorsement from Philip Bloom doesn’t hurt.

  14. Koen says:

    Hey Philip,

    The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II = € 1.265 / £ 1.103
    The Samyang 14mm 2.8 + Samyang 35mm 1.4 = € 728 / £ 635

    Is the Canon worth the extra cost ?
    (5DmkII, often shooting in lowlight conditions, I already have a 24-104 f4)

  15. mel haynes says:

    Thanks for this post. I am still building my kit and this would be a nice lens to have while waiting for my bank account to rise up enough to get the Zeiss lenses haha.


  16. laurens says:

    Looks good. For stills I still would go for the sigma because of the autofocus. How would this lens compare to an old Nikon lens for instance?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      old nikon lenses are great sill…this is nice and sharp with nice bokeh and less fiddly than an old Nikon lens

      1. squig says:

        I bought an old nikon ai f/1.4 to shoot in clubs but it sucked at f/1.4 which sucked because that’s what I bought it for, I already had the f/2. It was great from f/2 but the bokeh sucked too. The bokeh in your stills looks deliciously creamy. I ended up ditching all my nikkors for old leica’s but this one is tempting. 31 lenses might be a bit excessive though.

  17. Ethan MacCumber says:

    Is Samyang the same as Rikinon? I go on amazon and they only have Rikinon.

    1. Yusuf says:

      Yes it is same its only europian name for samyang

  18. kitty!
    sweet lens, wish I could afford it….
    im probably gonna end up getting the canon 35mm f2

    Anybody have any experience with that lens?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      i don’t know the f2 jordan

    2. andi says:

      i have pentax 35mm f2 one, i really love for micro 4/3..
      it is nice but yaou cannot shoot with this at long distance.. it will be reduce art picture..

  19. Andrew says:

    Great find! Shopping for bargain lenses is a pain… I hate taking my chances on. Any other quick suggestions for lesser known brands?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      not really. i do cover a lot of lenses on my which lenses blog…which i need to update to include this now!

    2. mark says:

      MIR 24N is a lovely lens (35mm f2), also check any old Nikkor 35mms..

  20. I got both the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and the Samyang 85mm 1.4 and I must say, the build quality of the samyang is much better! It feels sturdy and the focus ring is much smoother (probably because of the motors inside the Sigma).

    If you’ll only use this lens for video I’d go for the Samyang (Rokinon, Bower..). But then an all manual focus lens for photography, that’s kind of painful!

    Oh by the way, may I ask you guys. I like to use the autofocus to make sure I’m spot on before starting to shoot. Is it a bad habit to have for a filmmaker?


    1. Philip Bloom says:

      kick the habit!! 🙂

  21. Ahaha! Right, I’ll take care of that then! 😉

  22. Ronald Vonk says:

    Wasn’t expecting much from this lens but this looks promising. Must say I am pretty happy with the Canon 28mm/1.8 on my 7D though. Is anyone else here using it?

    A hard focus stop would be a huge improvement though. It’s too easy to focus past infinity with Canon AF lenses!

    1. Jamison Luther says:

      Only God can focus past infinity…and sometimes Christopher Nolan.

      1. Ronald Vonk says:

        Chuck Norris can focus his eyes past infinity and see the end of it.

  23. alex karas says:

    So I ended up buying the 14mm 2.8 yesterday after seeing the test below. I would rarely use the lens and I just couldn’t see spending over 2K for the Canon. I feel like every time I come to your blog I spend money. Thanks Philip.

  24. for people doubting samyang: the samyang 85mm f/1.4 is much closer to the canon 85mm f/1.2 or to the zeiss planar 85mm f/1.4 than to canon’s 85mm f/1.8; sure, it’s not nearly as good in terms of sharpness, but check out these bokeh tests!!

  25. Takeshi says:

    Hey Phillip,
    Thanks for the review.
    My mate had a Samyung 85mm which was absolutely brilliant.
    I have 50mm F1.4, 85mm 1.4 from Contax Carl Zeisses. These lenses are great too.
    BTW, When you take photos with manual lenses, how do you focus (without using Live view)? It’s really difficult to get focus on those mattes… Focus is so shallow… I wish the 5D had one of those focus screens with the split circle in it. But they don’t make those anymore…

  26. Mark Hughes says:

    Is there really a big difference in prime and zoom lenses for video? I use the Canon 24-70 2.8 as the go-to lens for most of my 5D work as I can’t tell any difference (image quality wise) between this and any of the prime lenses I’ve tested (admittedly I haven’t tested a Zeiss). 2.8 is normally fast enough for me and the flexibility of a zoom in the field can be priceless. Have you noticed big differences between good zooms and primes?

  27. Matt Davis says:

    Sometimes you look at a picture and laugh for the humour. Other times, you look at a picture and laugh with joy. Sorry Percy, not laughing at you, dude.

    This is the third lens that made me laugh with joy – the first was the Tokina 11-16. The second was the Sigma 50mm 1.4. Now the Samyang does the impossible: a wide(ish) angle lens with selective Depth of Field – isn’t that so absolutely and effingly wonderful?!

    Even with an FS100, you can make wonderful interview shots that give your subject plenty of space to put then in their environment without letting their environment muscle-in on their little private moment. That’s you, Percy, in the second shot.

    Good find, Mr Bloom – thanks for buying it on a whim, trying it and sharing the results with us. Would never have experienced this bit of glass without you.

  28. Nate says:

    I have been hearing more and more good things about these Samyang lenses.

    Have you used classic 35mm photo lenses adapted on EOS before? The classic Zeiss for Contax/Yashica mount or similar possibly. I love finding good and bad old lenses and trying them out with adapters, some give amazing color and bokeh. Wasn’t sure if you have ever tested out similar things.

  29. Devin says:

    Hey Philip,
    interesting lens- I was wondering if you have ever used older leica lenses at all, I found some on ebay for around $500, thought they would be great for video considering their reputation..

    And I was also wondering what the best old nikons you would use, pre-AI? I just shot a short using them and they were alright, was wondering if maybe the AI lenses from the 80’s might be sharper than the older ones?

    It would really be great if there was a bigger resource for checking out budget lenses, I know I would love to get some zeiss glass, but the truth is that I just cant afford it yet.

    I love the new work you’ve been doing lately by the way, it’s really incredible stuff.


  30. Sondre says:

    Hi everyone!

    Im about to get my first prime lens, and i want to achieve the best film look.

    Im thinking either to buy a sigma 30mm or the samyang 35mm.

    Any thoughts?


  31. Devin says:

    would you say this is better than the sigma 30 1.4?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      i dont own the Sigma so hard to say…

  32. Hans Steinert says:

    Man, this is tempting. I love the image quality of the Sigma with my 60D, but the stiff focus ring is a pain! Wonder if I should swap even if I don’t have a full frame camera.

    Thanks for sharing.

  33. Hey Philip Bloom! says:

    This looks like a great lens for the money – is the aperture ring smooth or clicky?!

    Cheers! 🙂


  34. Ordered mine, can’t wait to play with it!

  35. Alan Besedin says:

    Really want to buy this lens, but have one question for anyone who already has it.



    THANK YOU!!!

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      it focuses like a canon lens

      1. Gavin says:

        Hi there, Im new to photography and shooting with a DSLR, I have just bought a Canon 60D with a follow focus system and just a kit lens which will not work with the follow focus due to the size and position of the focus ring on the lens that I have. This lens looks really nice and fits within my proice range, would you recomend it for a newbie? and also is it a good lens for still photography too?

        Any help would be great

  36. matt carkeek says:

    Hi Philip

    Could you please explain this for the less enlightened amongst us, thanks.

    “The 35mm lens is one of those key lenses you should have in your kit, like a 50mm and an 85mm. Especially if you are using a crop sensor camera. On those camera cameras it gives you your standard lens field of view.”

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      it’s equivalent to your human eye field of view

  37. 58mm Rokkor says:

    It looks like the Samyang is actually more like a 38mm and not a true 35mm.

    Image quality seems pretty good. My main issue is the large physical size of this lens. Its bigger than the Canon EF 35/1.4 L.

    I am currently converting a Minolta Rokkor MC 35/1.8 which has really nice IQ but is much smaller with a 55mm filter size…

  38. “It looks like the Samyang is actually more like a 38mm and not a true 35mm.”

    Where are you getting this information from?

    1. Rokkor, Check this out:

      I don’t think the 38mm claim is true. Look at the angle of view comparisons. They are consistent with the 35L and Zeiss.

  39. maury covington jr says:

    Philip, thanks for the great blog! I shoot with a 7d and was thinking about getting some cooke kinetals (a cheap way to get a cine/prime set) Are these too out-of-date? I’ve seen some current stills captured with them and they look good. Would these crop the sensor of the 7d (due to them originally being made for 16mm cameras in the 50’s)?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      Hi Maury

      I have three old 35mm Cooke Kinetals bayonet mount which I have modified to PL. They are ok. 1 is sharp the other two not. They are 60 years old…they wont fit on a 7d without that PL mod which is expensive and means no canon lenses fit on it. Avoid the 16mm lenses they simply wont work.

      1. Prob better to save a little more and get a more modern set then.
        Thanks for the info.

  40. Got mine in finally! Will be testing it thoroughly this weekend:

  41. Gavin says:

    Hi Philip

    I’m really stuck between this lens and the sigma 1.4, I’m using a APS-C camera.

    I want to use it for a combo of video and stills.

    Any insight from anyone would be fantastic!

    1. Gavin says:

      Even more confused! These guys have now got two versions of this lens, one they call the video version with a ‘smooth aperture’ and the one above. Could anyone cast any light on the difference for me (beginner) and which one would be best for stills and video.


      1. Philip Bloom says:

        hi gavin…didn’t know that…get the smooth aperture, MUCH better! smooth exposure changes for video and fine adjustment for stills

  42. Martin Beek says:

    Ok, i bought this lens (Nikon mount) and put it on my AF101, but i can’t see it being useable for video, except for handheld, because of the following.
    When i turn the focus ring clockwise, the image moves up, and when i turn it c-clockwise, the image shifts down. On my 24 inch monitor, that’s more than one and a halve centimeter of image shift either way.
    Can you, Phil, or any other Samyang 35/1.4 owner confirm this? Or do i have a faulty lens OR Nikonmft convertor? I’ve seen this behaviour before with lenses, but not this violent.

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      wow…sounds faulty or the adaptor!

  43. Roger says:

    Hi folks !
    I am searching this second version of the samyang 35mm 1.4 with “smooth aperture” for video but I can’t find it clearly. Any idea ?

  44. Moyano says:

    Hi Philip! nice review! I’m really happy with this lens!

    1. Sam says:

      Finally a quality test video with this lens! I can’t seem to find many. And the color grade was an added bonus. Thanks!

  45. Royce says:

    Hi Philip

    I was thinking of getting a Nikon 35mm f/1.4 for my canon 5d, I can see on ebay if i get lucky i can get for around $500 more or less the same price of the samyang.

    Would you recommend the samyang over this?

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      depends on which one. I really am impressed by the Samyang

  46. I’ve actually heard that this lens has less of a “breathing” issue than the Zeiss 35 2.0 that I’m also considering. Does anyone have any experience with either regarding lens breathing while focusing?

  47. hisham aly says:

    hello my work is mainly video and i shoot feature films in lowbudget, then transfare it to 35 mm screens “trailer for my 1st feature ”

    so i do own some lenses , to my eyes and iam just a director and editor not dop, i think its ok u just add lil bit contrast after the zeiss to canon lens to match some times not but am not the expert here
    do u think matching sets is very important , or the different look can easly matched during colour grading.
    and do u think i could i shoot with this set as an example:” for 5d mark2
    24-70L ” use it as a 24 and 35 end only”
    zeiss ze 50 f1.4
    canon 85 f1.8 or samyang 85 f1.4
    sigma 150 f2.8
    sigma 12-24 4.5-5.6 or samyang 14 f2.8
    17-50 tamaron only for 7d on car mounts or danger positions
    sigma 70-20 macro dg f2.8″ i dont use alot”
    do u think this will match
    or should i get loan and do changes
    note: selling used in my country isnt easy and its not easy to sell my lever to buy new lenses so plz tell me what is bad in my collection appreciate u r help sorry for my bad english thxxxxxxxxxxxx thxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  48. hisham aly says:

    my 24-70 canon l lens stoped working with no accident aperture stucked at f22 so i sent it out of my country to fix and i replaced my sigma 70-200 f2.8 with Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 IF EX DG HSM did i made right acording to lenses above i have

  49. umbrella says:

    call me retarded but this has to be cleared up in my mind. So here goes.
    I’m a micro four thirds shooter GH1 and GH2, micro four thirds sensor – 35mm equivalent. Is a lenses on a full frame system say a 35mm 1.4 different on a MFT system? as in is it the same field of view? am i getting a true 35mm? If so then never mind, but if i’m not, then why are lenses on MFT systems named in 35mm format? Am i getting less field of view on a MFT system as appose to the field of view i’d get on full frame with the same lens? someone please clear this up, it will help me buy better, because if i’m right about this all i really need are fast lenses between 7mm – 58mm. Primes that is. maybe one zoom, The Oly 11 – 22mm f2.8.

  50. umbrella says:

    I’ve just been over at Abelcine hope I spelt that right. Ok so, from this day forth start thinking in WNT, Wide Normal Tele, instead of MM if your a MFT shooter. this changes everything given the fact that lenses on a MFT sensor aren’t actually what they say they are. Wiser and upset but laughing . This is big to me.

    Widest you can get with MFT is the 7 – 14mm? just remember that it’s actually something like 18 – 30? not sure, near enough. So I can’t actually shoot 14mm, why the f**k is Panasonic naming their lenses in 35mm format, actually never mind scrap this whole post, i remember seeing this somewhere haha sorry, yeah business is retarded. But WNT stands. That full frame crowd is looking rather inviting right now panasonic. But i’ll stay for my own reasons.

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      all lenses no matter what they are for are in MM. it’s irrelevant what camera the lens is designed for when it comes to it’s focal length. That will never change. It’s the equivalent field of view that changes.

  51. umbrella says:

    actually the 7-14mm is 14mm at its widest point in 35mm so there you go. 14mm lens. widest in MFT.

  52. Jus says:

    i disagree with you, that the L Series Canon Lenses are better than the Samyang 35. Especially for stills. Could you back your opinion, with some pics.
    Btw, the Samyang does not automatically focus at Infinity, at the very end of the focus ring. That is one of it’s few drawbacks.

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      I love my Samyang and it’s a great video lens. But the lack of autofocus makes stills harder of course. Optically it is good but not as sharp as the Canon wide open

  53. Guilherme says:

    Hi Philip!
    I have two buying options: 1) Carl Zeiss ZF (not ZF.2) 35mm f.2 and this 2) Samyang 35mm 1.4.

    I’m currently using a Canon 7D, mostly for video, and really thinking about the future and building my lens kit to last for a long time. Don’t mind about the price because I have a Zeiss in bargain. What do you think about it?

    I currently only have a Sigma 24-70mm f.2.8 that just a hell lot of job, but the small focus ring is killing me!


  54. Monu says:

    will Samyang cut in with canon lenses

    Pardon me for I am first timer with interchangeable lenses.

  55. Monu says:

    Thank you! I truly believe people like you make the world a better place for living. Touch wood.

  56. Monu says:

    I am ordering samyang (rokinon) 35mm and am wondering about canon 50mm 1.8.

    This may sound stupid but can 1.4 intercut 1.8 in cinematography process without grading. For instance by using filters, or any other way.

    Do we have to shoot B O T H lenses at 1.8. I want to use samyang at 1.4 because i have h e a r d that it is insanely sharp at that f-stop number.

    Please pardon my ignorance.

  57. Monu says:


    I’m Sorry for flooding with too many comments.

    Does samyang + 7d look good on 40 foot screen?

    Please reply for no matter how foolish the question might sound, this doubt needs to be cleared for me.

    Thank you. 🙂

  58. Monu says:

    please reply

  59. Monu says:

    Sir please tell me how you feel about photoship one?

    PS: I’m not promoting.

  60. Monu says:


    This (link below) is really a bugger. These links suggest sigma has far better resolution than Samyang. Please help me out here –

    1. Is Sigma better in terms of image quality.

    2. Does Samyang have good enough resolution for cinema?

    sigma 30mm


    samyang 35mm

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      i have never touched the sigma so i can’t say…sorry!

  61. Nitish Rai says:

    thanks, but

    1. is samyang good enough for cinema quality?

    2. or should one have to have zeiss/canon lenses at least for technical reasons?

    PS: Hope I am not pestering.

    1. Yusuf says:

      Samyang are very sharp lenses i use them for fil they are great !!
      35 mm 1.4
      14 mm 2.8
      8 mm 3.5
      85mm 1.4

  62. Monu says:

    thanx, how foolish of me, you replied on the other page where i had posted as well.

    Again sorry and thanks

    Cheers, you’re the man

  63. Hey Philip, firstly cheers for your blog. Has helped me make many a decision on equipment in the past.

    I found the following comparison by Matt Duclos between the Zeiss 1.4 and the Samyang 1.4 35mm lenses.

    From what I can see, if you are not going to buy a matching set of cinema primes then the Samyang appears to be the obvious choice. Its also kind of nice how it doesn’t change length while focussing.

    Seems I’m going to be poor again in the not so distant future.

  64. Monu says:

    how do you rate hoya filter

  65. thePeter says:

    Hello Philip.
    What mount should I go for? Nikon or Canon? I am using a Canon 550D for now, but most probably I will replace it in the future.


    1. Philip Bloom says:

      whatever makes the most sense for you. i would say nikon for me

  66. Yusuf says:

    Hi philip

    What is sharper image for video 5d mark ii or GH2 to me it look like GH2 has better image i mean sharper image for video ??

    1. Philip Bloom says:

      GH2 is sharper for sure.

      1. Yusuf says:

        Thanks phi…

  67. Kamil Papiez says:

    Hey Philip,

    I know it is very old topic, but I hope you could help.

    I want to buy a 35mm lens for my DSLR.

    I checked Samyang 35mm F1.4 on eBay and it runs for around $500. But, the same price is for old Nikkor EIS 35mm 1.4 + you can get good deal on craigslist if you are lucky.
    Which do you think is better for shooting video?

    Thanks a lot.

    1. Kamil Papiez says:

      I meant AIS… not EIS

  68. Robert Haltiner says:

    Hi Phil,

    I’m looking to purchase this lens for to shoot video with my 7D and I’ve learnt you can buy it de-clicked too. I’d go for the de-clicked version but I’m located in Australia and can’t find it available anywhere…

    Is the click version a deal-breaker if I want the option to adjust aperture whilst filming?

  69. […] estar muy bien por lo que dice aqui A really nice “budget” manual focus (and on lens aperture!) 35mm F1.4 lens | Philip Bloo… Responder Citando googletag.cmd.push(function() { […]

  70. shurai says:

    Just bought the Cine version of this lens and I’m having the worst time controlling the exposure. I’ll take a photo and it’ll be a few stops brighter when I view it, so I always have to guess and under expose my shots when shooting.

    I heard of this happening in the view finder but I’m using Live View. Is this normal? I like manual focus, and manual aperture but always having to guess what my exposure is doesn’t seem like the best workflow.

    I have this on a Canon 60D.

  71. BlairFilmic says:

    Super excited for the new Rokinon Cine lens set.

  72. mrquartz says:

    Hello Philip great review here, for some reason I found another 35mm SAMYANG T1.5 supposedly a cine lens, as far as im aware the only difference is that the cine version has a Geared Focus and Aperture Control Ring according to the website,but again im not too sure about that.

    Whats your take on that mate. im close to buying one.


    1. Philip Bloom says:

      it’s the same glass…just with gears like you said. I have that one. Lovely smooth iris!!