<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My first short shot with the Canon 7d: &#8220;Shaving it back&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/</link>
	<description>Filmmaker, DP, Director</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbloom</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-88059</link>
		<dc:creator>pbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-88059</guid>
		<description>You really asking which camera? Check out the title of film, the blog, the title or thenceedita!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really asking which camera? Check out the title of film, the blog, the title or thenceedita!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camera base plate panasonic dvx100</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-87982</link>
		<dc:creator>camera base plate panasonic dvx100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-87982</guid>
		<description>Very nice...........
That looks great! But what I’d like to know is what camera you shot this video with great
the quality is amazing!
Very good idea! Congratulation!
 
easy to handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
That looks great! But what I’d like to know is what camera you shot this video with great<br />
the quality is amazing!<br />
Very good idea! Congratulation!</p>
<p>easy to handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Foster</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-62596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-62596</guid>
		<description>Great site Phillip.

What is &quot;Pro Res LT&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site Phillip.</p>
<p>What is &#8220;Pro Res LT&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 7D DSLR &#124; Observin</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-29510</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 7D DSLR &#124; Observin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-29510</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloom Shaving It Back &#8211; First decent short [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloom Shaving It Back &#8211; First decent short [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Bernatchez</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-19014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Bernatchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-19014</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was mainly just answering specifically for DSLRs since the APS-C chip the OP was inquiring about is (as far as i know) only found in DSLRs. So I didn&#039;t even think to clarify that I meant stills full frame :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was mainly just answering specifically for DSLRs since the APS-C chip the OP was inquiring about is (as far as i know) only found in DSLRs. So I didn&#8217;t even think to clarify that I meant stills full frame <img src='http://philipbloom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbloom</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-18713</link>
		<dc:creator>pbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-18713</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s kind. i love my C5 work but all these toys when used right can produce incredible results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s kind. i love my C5 work but all these toys when used right can produce incredible results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaveh Shirdel</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-18703</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaveh Shirdel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-18703</guid>
		<description>I think there is a really important point in the development of these products. So far it has been very accidental and more about film makers seeing the potential in these cameras and wanting this kind of depth of field and solid state etc rather than companies like Canon designing purpose made products. This has been supported by the a flood of photographers jumping into video as the market value of photography crashes and commercial internet video production takes hold. It will be interesting to see if Canon can bring this technology into a product designed from the outset for the purpose of film making as so far they have really just been reacting to a phenomenon that has caught them by surprise.

I hope he won&#039;t mind me saying but I still think Philip&#039;s work shot on DVCAM for channel 5 is the best work on his site. No big chips but there&#039;s no compromise and it shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a really important point in the development of these products. So far it has been very accidental and more about film makers seeing the potential in these cameras and wanting this kind of depth of field and solid state etc rather than companies like Canon designing purpose made products. This has been supported by the a flood of photographers jumping into video as the market value of photography crashes and commercial internet video production takes hold. It will be interesting to see if Canon can bring this technology into a product designed from the outset for the purpose of film making as so far they have really just been reacting to a phenomenon that has caught them by surprise.</p>
<p>I hope he won&#8217;t mind me saying but I still think Philip&#8217;s work shot on DVCAM for channel 5 is the best work on his site. No big chips but there&#8217;s no compromise and it shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnaght</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-18523</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnaght</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-18523</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Philip on this one. Whilst the &quot;FF&quot; format is bigger than the main prevailing motion image formats, many of these achieved their dominance for reasons of technical practicality, economics and sufficient quality for the delivery mediums of the day. Therefore it&#039;s surely possible that aesthetically better formats will come along as things progress. After all 4:3 was dominant for many years but few are arguing that is a reason in itself for sticking with it. 

That all said &quot;FF&quot; may well prove a step too far for many, it&#039;s greatest strength, shallow depth of field, being also it&#039;s greatest weakness in many shooting situations. I think a fair few will have unfortunate experiences shooting with it.

The 7D appears to have addressed a lot of the issues with the 5D and with it&#039;s perhaps more practical, and closer to movie 35mm format, will probably be a better solution for many everyday uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Philip on this one. Whilst the &#8220;FF&#8221; format is bigger than the main prevailing motion image formats, many of these achieved their dominance for reasons of technical practicality, economics and sufficient quality for the delivery mediums of the day. Therefore it&#8217;s surely possible that aesthetically better formats will come along as things progress. After all 4:3 was dominant for many years but few are arguing that is a reason in itself for sticking with it. </p>
<p>That all said &#8220;FF&#8221; may well prove a step too far for many, it&#8217;s greatest strength, shallow depth of field, being also it&#8217;s greatest weakness in many shooting situations. I think a fair few will have unfortunate experiences shooting with it.</p>
<p>The 7D appears to have addressed a lot of the issues with the 5D and with it&#8217;s perhaps more practical, and closer to movie 35mm format, will probably be a better solution for many everyday uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantron</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-18156</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-18156</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the Panny GH1 is US$200 less expensive than the EOS 7D, and it comes with a stock 10x focal range zoom lens that has AF and is almost totally silent. With the 7D, you get the body only for $1,699.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the Panny GH1 is US$200 less expensive than the EOS 7D, and it comes with a stock 10x focal range zoom lens that has AF and is almost totally silent. With the 7D, you get the body only for $1,699.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantron</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/09/04/my-first-short-shot-with-the-canon-7d-shaving-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-18146</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=5094#comment-18146</guid>
		<description>Okay, Myles.... and now tell us, won&#039;t you, how do you REALLY feel about Mr. Bloom.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Myles&#8230;. and now tell us, won&#8217;t you, how do you REALLY feel about Mr. Bloom.  <img src='http://philipbloom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: philipbloom.net @ 2012-02-12 01:48:08 -->
