<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 7d rumour could be real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/</link>
	<description>Filmmaker, DP, Director</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: endeavour</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17173</link>
		<dc:creator>endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17173</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or is the whole model numbering thing getting a bit confusing.  I can&#039;t see this being a 5D replacement if the kit lens is not an L.  I think the 50D is more likely, even though less than a year old, it just missed out on getting video and Canon need to counter the D300s.  Which makes the price point a little difficult to believe as it is more than double a 50D and significantly more than a D300s.

I think the key thing we will want to know about this camera is going to be the processor.  If it is Digic 4 and does end up with 24p then one would assume that would make it only a software issue to get it on the 5DII.  If they don&#039;t want 5DII owners outside their offices with pitchforks and scythes we would probably get new firmware.

If it has a new chip then we may be out of luck until 5DIII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is the whole model numbering thing getting a bit confusing.  I can&#8217;t see this being a 5D replacement if the kit lens is not an L.  I think the 50D is more likely, even though less than a year old, it just missed out on getting video and Canon need to counter the D300s.  Which makes the price point a little difficult to believe as it is more than double a 50D and significantly more than a D300s.</p>
<p>I think the key thing we will want to know about this camera is going to be the processor.  If it is Digic 4 and does end up with 24p then one would assume that would make it only a software issue to get it on the 5DII.  If they don&#8217;t want 5DII owners outside their offices with pitchforks and scythes we would probably get new firmware.</p>
<p>If it has a new chip then we may be out of luck until 5DIII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Filipe Cunha</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17171</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Filipe Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17171</guid>
		<description>I´m still learning...allways learning ,-)
New Canon rumors  give an oportunity to ask and learn a bit more with you:

1.
Philip,
what´s the use for two 5DMII bodies? Practical example please.

2.
with Zeiss ZE or ZF lens on 5DMII, we can use automatic features or just manual?

3.
I´d love to see the India video. When?

Thanks again for all your help and sharing.

Luis Filipe Cunha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I´m still learning&#8230;allways learning ,-)<br />
New Canon rumors  give an oportunity to ask and learn a bit more with you:</p>
<p>1.<br />
Philip,<br />
what´s the use for two 5DMII bodies? Practical example please.</p>
<p>2.<br />
with Zeiss ZE or ZF lens on 5DMII, we can use automatic features or just manual?</p>
<p>3.<br />
I´d love to see the India video. When?</p>
<p>Thanks again for all your help and sharing.</p>
<p>Luis Filipe Cunha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nino</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17164</link>
		<dc:creator>Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17164</guid>
		<description>I also don&#039;t think this will be a 5D successor or superior to the 5D in terms of sensor size or resolution. 

Higher model numbers usually are cheaper models. That&#039;s why the EOS 1Ds Mark III is their top model.

I think the 7D might sport the same sensor size as the Nikon D300s and be its direct competitor. We&#039;ll see soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#8217;t think this will be a 5D successor or superior to the 5D in terms of sensor size or resolution. </p>
<p>Higher model numbers usually are cheaper models. That&#8217;s why the EOS 1Ds Mark III is their top model.</p>
<p>I think the 7D might sport the same sensor size as the Nikon D300s and be its direct competitor. We&#8217;ll see soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curnsie</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17162</link>
		<dc:creator>curnsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17162</guid>
		<description>That price was based on a placeholder though. See this post
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=180769</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That price was based on a placeholder though. See this post<br />
<a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=180769" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=180769</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbloom</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17161</link>
		<dc:creator>pbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17161</guid>
		<description>that is a lot of money, almost the same as the 5d for a non full frame camera. maybe they will drop the resolution of the sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is a lot of money, almost the same as the 5d for a non full frame camera. maybe they will drop the resolution of the sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curnsie</title>
		<link>http://philipbloom.net/2009/08/19/canon-7d-rumour-could-be-real/comment-page-1/#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>curnsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipbloom.co.uk/?p=4903#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>You can give me that second 5d if it annoys you that much... ;)

Some say the 7D is a replacement for the 50D, so perhaps not full frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can give me that second 5d if it annoys you that much&#8230; <img src='http://philipbloom.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Some say the 7D is a replacement for the 50D, so perhaps not full frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: philipbloom.net @ 2012-02-07 18:18:22 -->
